Opinion | Geopolitics reshapes the budget: How war is now a core variable in fresh fruit logistics

By Rafael Guarda Martínez | Lawyer and ag and shipping expert at RG Consultant

Anyone who works in or is involved in the export and import of fresh fruit and perishables can no longer think of international logistics as a stable line item in the budget.

Armed conflicts and regional tensions are reshaping maritime routes, altering shipping itineraries, and heightening the legal and financial exposure for every shipment. War is no longer a distant headline—it’s a variable that directly impacts a company's commercial, operational, and contractual planning.

When clashes in strategic global trade corridors escalate, shipping companies react quickly. They modify routes, skip stops, suspend crossings considered unsafe, or redirect entire fleets toward alternative routes. These decisions are not solely based on economic criteria, but on risk assessments related to the safety of crews, vessels, and the international logistics chain itself.

For the agribusiness sector, these operational adjustments can translate into something much more complex than a simple delay. A precisely designed commercial program can become completely misaligned if the cargo arrives outside the optimal market window. 

The impact is measured not only in additional days of navigation, but also in the loss of commercial stability, pricing pressure, additional costs, contractual breaches, and, in certain cases, the activation of penalties agreed upon with clients at the destination.

In this context, logistics management ceases to be an administrative function and becomes a high-level strategic decision. Choosing a route today involves evaluating not only estimated costs and times, but also geopolitical stability, exposure to conflict zones, service reliability, and the real capacity to adhere to the contracted itinerary. 

Sometimes, the alternative that appears most efficient on paper is the most vulnerable to a local, regional, or global escalation.

Prevention, the best logistic strategy against an ever-changing geopolitical map

From a legal standpoint, it is also essential to understand how risks are redistributed in the face of war-related disruptions.

In maritime transport, armed conflicts and hostile acts are usually classified as force majeure (act of God). This means that if a delay occurs as a direct consequence of a warlike situation or a serious threat to navigation, the carrier may be exempt from liability, provided the decision taken is reasonable and proportionate to the risk faced.

This affects the cargo owner directly, as there will not always be a party to whom the cost of the delay can be transferred. If the logistics company proves that the itinerary alteration was necessary in light of an unforeseeable scenario, the chance of successfully making a claim decreases considerably. 

Therefore, relying on subsequent compensation as the main strategy, in this context, is a legally weak gamble.

That is when prevention becomes critical in the logistics strategy. Before shipping, it is advisable to analyze the full service route, including transshipment points, sensitive corridors, and the operational stability of the involved ports.

It is also crucial to maintain fluid and permanent communication with the shipping company and the logistics operator, demanding updated information on any itinerary changes, extraordinary surcharges, or deviations. Anticipation allows for managing expectations with clients at the destination and adjusting commercial decisions with greater room for maneuver.

The financial impact of this new logistics outlook must not be overlooked, either. Conflict scenarios often translate into war risk surcharges, increased insurance premiums, higher fuel costs due to alternative routes, and rises in freight rates. These factors can erode already narrow margins if they are not considered in a timely manner within the price structure or contractual negotiation.

Transit insurance in war times

Another aspect that gains special relevance in times of conflict is transit insurance.

In periods of stability, many companies assume that their coverage adequately responds to any contingency. However, war scenarios require a more detailed review of terms and conditions.

Not all coverages include armed conflict-related risks. In some cases, protection against damage resulting from acts of war requires specific clauses or paying additional premiums.

Likewise, when the damage is linked to a delay, as with perishables deteriorating due to extended transit times, coverage may be subject to particular limitations or exclusions.

This implies asking your broker or insurer directly: Is the cargo covered against war risks on the route used? Are there applicable sub-limits? What happens if the loss is an indirect consequence of a forced diversion?

Having clarity before shipment is radically different from trying to interpret it after the problem.

Additionally, in case of damage or deterioration, reacting early is crucial. Timely inspections, formal notifications, and the safeguarding of documentation are essential steps to preserve rights against carriers and insurers. In complex environments, where delay, congestion, and market variations converge, documentary solidity can define the outcome of a claim.

International maritime logistics is going through a period of structural volatility, in which war influences routes, costs, times, and the distribution of responsibilities.

For the agribusiness sector, adapting to this environment demands a strategic perspective, where the management of logistical risk requires the same level of attention as product quality at origin, financial planning, and commercial negotiation.

Today, more than ever, shipping fruit implies understanding that the geopolitical context is also part of the business. Anticipating scenarios, structuring contracts in a smart way, and reviewing coverages against technical criteria is not a defensive reaction, but a competitive advantage. 

In a world where routes can change in a matter of days, the difference will not only be in producing well, but in managing risk with vision and discipline.

*All images are referential. 

Related stories

Opinion | Beyond supply and demand: The new geopolitical reality of agriculture

Opinion | Cold treatment is what opens markets for fruit—or closes them