House farm bill advances amid sharp divisions over liability, animal welfare

Following deep partisan discord over $187 billion in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and major restructuring of nutrition aid, the United States House of Representatives passed the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 on April 30 by a narrow 224–200 vote. 

The move advances a long-awaited farm bill that includes much-anticipated investments in specialty crops. However, industry stakeholders have noted that it leaves major policy disputes unresolved.

Lawmakers stripped out a controversial provision that would have shielded pesticide manufacturers from state-level "failure to warn" lawsuits.

Jason Davidson, Senior Food and Agriculture Campaigner with non-profit organization Friends of the Earth, applauded the pesticide amendment, calling it a “tremendous victory for Americans’ ability to hold these companies accountable”.

Broader uncertainty remains

The produce and tree nut supply chain welcomed elements of the bill tied to specialty crop support, emphasizing the need for stability in a volatile cost and trade environment.

“America’s apple growers thank Chairman GT Thompson for his leadership in advancing a new Farm Bill [...]. This is a critical step toward long-term certainty for growers,” USApple noted. 

The pome fruit group stated growers are “especially encouraged by a more responsive framework for specialty crop assistance”.

USApple urged the Senate to act swiftly so that a bipartisan Farm Bill can get to the president’s desk as soon as possible.

The California Walnut Commission also pointed to the bill’s role in long-term planning for specialty crop producers, citing ongoing production and market pressures. The organization stated the measure represents “meaningful progress toward renewing federal farm policy and supports continued Senate efforts to finalize the legislation.”

Animal welfare provisions spark backlash

Despite a more positive outlook on pesticide concerns, animal welfare groups strongly criticized the inclusion of the Save Our Bacon Act, which would invalidate certain state and local farm-animal welfare laws.

"National polling shows that the majority of Americans, regardless of political party, believe that policymakers in Washington are not doing enough to protect animals, and the ASPCA cannot Vice President of Government Relations for The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA).

Aside from concerns about chemical use and humane treatment of animals, more than 300 food and farm groups have already urged lawmakers to reject the current version, citing that it does not adequately address rising input costs, including fuel and fertilizer, or export market disruptions tied to ongoing trade tensions.

The bill also includes a Republican-backed rollback of emissions standards on farm equipment, which the party said were driving up costs for farmers.

The legislation cannot move to the Senate until the House votes on a separate measure to allow year-round sales of higher-ethanol-blend gasoline, currently expected on May 13.

*All images are referential

Related stories: 

House Committee approves 2026 farm bill, moves to floor debate

“Still so much to do” beyond reconciliation, NABC says on Farm Bill